The appellate judge wrote that under the previous ruling, she would have to
use her break time to incompletely express breast milk and ignore her bodily functions, or abdicate her decision to express breast milk, resulting in significant pain.
He also wrote that ignoring her status as a lactating mother placed her at a "significant disadvantage in comparison to her peers."
The decision goes beyond the immediate context to publicize the medical and social imperative to support breastfeeding and to support women who choose to both be mothers and work outside the home.
Further thoughts are in this earlier post.